{ "attribution": { "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com", "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-292-10", "cite_as": "NovaCopilot, legal.exploreworldai.com (https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-292-10)", "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision", "version": "legal-2026-10-27", "fingerprint": "ewai:se:bf2a18", "proof": "sha256:b19d5a2c41ca16f698d85f0e187d2968c845815c7314e455f077308cbb030cdc", "jurisdiction": "se", "lang": "en", "publisher": "NovaCopilot by ExploreWorld Legal", "terms": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/om" }, "brand_source": "Source: NovaCopilot", "object_type": "edge", "object_id": "edge:eu:c-292-10", "schema_version": "1", "schema": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/schemas/edge", "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-292-10", "judgment": { "id": "eu:c-292-10", "text": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/judgment-text?id=eu:c-292-10" }, "siblings": { "risk": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/risk/eu:c-292-10", "relation": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/relation/eu:c-292-10", "change": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/change/eu:c-292-10", "agent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/agent/eu:c-292-10", "provenance": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-292-10", "status": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/status/eu:c-292-10", "precedent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-292-10", "element": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/element/eu:c-292-10", "decision": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/decision/eu:c-292-10", "weight": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-292-10", "conflict": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-292-10", "citation_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-292-10" }, "source": "NovaCopilot", "precedent_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/precedent-graph/eu:c-292-10", "item": { "judgment": "eu:c-292-10", "outgoing": [ { "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-292-10~follows~c-327-10", "type": "follows", "label_sv": "följer", "from": "eu:c-292-10", "to": { "ref": "C-327/10", "id": "eu:c-327-10", "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-327-10" }, "paragraph_ids": [ "para_242" ], "excerpt": "In that regard, it must be borne in mind, firstly, that where the domicile of a defendant who is a Member State national is unknown, the application of the uniform rules of jurisdiction established by Regulation No 44/2001 instead of those in force in the different Member States meets the essential ", "decided": "2012-03-15", "hash": "c186f7d85deeaa0669edf142874b6e91ca5d57fc0724b4560dd294dec5cc2a59" }, { "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-292-10~follows~c-341-06", "type": "follows", "label_sv": "följer", "from": "eu:c-292-10", "to": { "ref": "C-341/06", "id": null, "url": null }, "paragraph_ids": [ "para_195" ], "excerpt": "Must the national court refuse, in accordance with past case-law of the Court (most recently Case C-341/06 Petersen [[2010] ECR I-47] ), to apply national rules permitting service by public notice even if national law grants such power of rejection only to the (German) Bundesverfassungsgericht (Fede", "decided": "2012-03-15", "hash": "76fb1448be15233e70139db172fb91c7986206137af3ddd6143c88d1b932028a" }, { "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-292-10~cites~c-161-10", "type": "cites", "label_sv": "hänvisar till", "from": "eu:c-292-10", "to": { "ref": "C-161/10", "id": null, "url": null }, "paragraph_ids": [ "para_227", "para_230" ], "excerpt": "By letter of 28 October 2011, the Registry of the Court sent the national court a copy of the judgment in Joined Cases C-509/09 and C-161/10 eDate Advertising and Others [2011] ECR I-10269 , requesting it to state whether, in the light of that judgment, it wished to maintain Questions (5) to (11) in", "decided": "2012-03-15", "hash": "df98d68dc1c35e3b3c80eccc58492f0f42724800726c578fdf64f1ad08ca3a78" }, { "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-292-10~cites~c-394-07", "type": "cites", "label_sv": "hänvisar till", "from": "eu:c-292-10", "to": { "ref": "C-394/07", "id": "eu:c-394-07", "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-394-07" }, "paragraph_ids": [ "para_259" ], "excerpt": "As regards the requirements to be met during the proceedings, it must be borne in mind that all the provisions of Regulation No 44/2001 express the intention to ensure that, within the scope of the objectives of that regulation, proceedings leading to the delivery of judicial decisions take place in", "decided": "2012-03-15", "hash": "64bbcb71a65c9d9df44a8cc2ac1a760b2fbf84a744201022e617d3247c2975b9" }, { "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-292-10~cites~c-509-09", "type": "cites", "label_sv": "hänvisar till", "from": "eu:c-292-10", "to": { "ref": "C-509/09", "id": null, "url": null }, "paragraph_ids": [ "para_227", "para_230" ], "excerpt": "By letter of 28 October 2011, the Registry of the Court sent the national court a copy of the judgment in Joined Cases C-509/09 and C-161/10 eDate Advertising and Others [2011] ECR I-10269 , requesting it to state whether, in the light of that judgment, it wished to maintain Questions (5) to (11) in", "decided": "2012-03-15", "hash": "aecc27a9b6fe66dcd40513a00f3911f4d983d452f23759ca4d89d6043f6cd7a3" }, { "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-292-10~cites~c-522-03", "type": "cites", "label_sv": "hänvisar till", "from": "eu:c-292-10", "to": { "ref": "C-522/03", "id": "eu:c-522-03", "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-522-03" }, "paragraph_ids": [ "para_271" ], "excerpt": "It is true that the question whether the document instituting proceedings was duly served on a defendant in default of appearance must be determined in the light of the provisions of that convention, (Case C-522/03 Scania Finance France [2005] ECR I-8639 , paragraph 30) and, a fortiori, in the light", "decided": "2012-03-15", "hash": "2bc73231926dd35a9424b9c4273dd8ca923c2cb24803f7738b3b26d31d7583fd" }, { "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-292-10~cites~c-68-93", "type": "cites", "label_sv": "hänvisar till", "from": "eu:c-292-10", "to": { "ref": "C-68/93", "id": "eu:c-68-93", "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-68-93" }, "paragraph_ids": [ "para_214" ], "excerpt": "If the referring court has jurisdiction for the action according to the above questions: Do the legal principles laid down in the Court’s judgment in Case C-68/93 Shevill and Others [1995] ECR I-415 also apply in the case described above?", "decided": "2012-03-15", "hash": "5f637441797583c80effa7f0da2444007467616299f57f2bfb80414154c8e8fd" } ], "incoming": [ { "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-133-11~cites~c-292-10", "type": "cites", "label_sv": "hänvisar till", "from": "eu:c-133-11", "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-133-11", "paragraph_ids": [ "para_147" ], "excerpt": "The objectives, pursued by that provision and repeatedly stressed in case-law (see Case C-292/10 G [2012] ECR, paragraph 39, and Wintersteiger , paragraph 23), of ensuring that the court with jurisdiction is foreseeable and of preserving legal certainty are not connected either to the allocation of " }, { "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-183-23~follows~c-292-10", "type": "follows", "label_sv": "följer", "from": "eu:c-183-23", "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-183-23", "paragraph_ids": [ "para_108", "para_153" ], "excerpt": "That is why, if the domicile of a defendant consumer who is a national of a Member State is unknown, the Court has held that Article 4(1) of Regulation No 44/2001, the wording of which is, in essence, equivalent to that of Article 6(1) of Regulation No 1215/2012, applies only if the national court h" }, { "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-215-15~cites~c-292-10", "type": "cites", "label_sv": "hänvisar till", "from": "eu:c-215-15", "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-215-15", "paragraph_ids": [ "para_291" ], "excerpt": "( 45 ) See, by analogy, judgment in G ( C-292/10 , EU:C:2012:142 , paragraphs 53 to 55 )." }, { "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-306-17~cites~c-292-10", "type": "cites", "label_sv": "hänvisar till", "from": "eu:c-306-17", "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-306-17", "paragraph_ids": [ "para_99" ], "excerpt": "As that regulation does not determine the conditions in which, after having established its international jurisdiction pursuant to that regulation, a court may or must examine together a number of claims involving the same parties, those conditions fall, in theory, within the procedural autonomy of " }, { "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-375-13~follows~c-292-10", "type": "follows", "label_sv": "följer", "from": "eu:c-375-13", "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-375-13", "paragraph_ids": [ "para_260" ], "excerpt": "Although that is an aspect of national procedural law that the regulation is not intended to unify (see, to that effect, judgment in G , C-292/10, EU:C:2012:142 , paragraph 44), the application of the relevant national laws must not, nevertheless, impair the effectiveness of Regulation No 44/2001 (s" }, { "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-433-18~cites~c-292-10", "type": "cites", "label_sv": "hänvisar till", "from": "eu:c-433-18", "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-433-18", "paragraph_ids": [ "para_101" ], "excerpt": "In that regard, the Court has recalled that all the provisions of Regulation No 44/2001 express the intention to ensure that, within the scope of the objectives of that regulation, proceedings leading to the delivery of judicial decisions take place in such a way that the rights of the defence are o" }, { "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-518-18~cites~c-292-10", "type": "cites", "label_sv": "hänvisar till", "from": "eu:c-518-18", "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-518-18", "paragraph_ids": [ "para_123" ], "excerpt": "The Court observed that, in the light of Article 14(2) of Regulation No 805/2004 and the objectives and scheme of that regulation, a judgment by default issued in circumstances where it is impossible to ascertain the domicile of the defendant cannot be certified as a European Enforcement Order (judg" }, { "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-66-17~follows~c-292-10", "type": "follows", "label_sv": "följer", "from": "eu:c-66-17", "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-66-17", "paragraph_ids": [ "para_123" ], "excerpt": "However, given that the conditions for the application of the derogation from the common system of recognition of judgments established by that regulation are to be interpreted strictly (see, to that effect, judgment of 15 March 2012, G, C-292/10 , EU:C:2012:142 , paragraph 64 ), that objective cann" }, { "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-70-22~cites~c-292-10", "type": "cites", "label_sv": "hänvisar till", "from": "eu:c-70-22", "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-70-22", "paragraph_ids": [ "para_121" ], "excerpt": "In the absence of such establishment, the mechanism laid down in Article 3(2) of Directive 2000/31 does not apply (judgment of 15 March 2012, G, C-292/10 , EU:C:2012:142 , paragraph 71 and the case-law cited)." }, { "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-94-14~follows~c-292-10", "type": "follows", "label_sv": "följer", "from": "eu:c-94-14", "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-94-14", "paragraph_ids": [ "para_184" ], "excerpt": "As regards the requirements to be met during the proceedings, it must be borne in mind that all the provisions of Regulation No 44/2001 express the intention to ensure that, within the scope of the objectives of that regulation, proceedings leading to the delivery of judicial decisions take place in" } ], "acts": [], "counts": { "outgoing": 7, "incoming": 10, "acts": 0 }, "follow": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-292-10?follow=5", "hash": "713747ad1a756014a7892577808ab20d976b2700e3b9479a39586288d4da2d62" }, "links": { "provisions": null, "case_law": { "precedent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-292-10", "conflict": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-292-10", "citation_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-292-10", "weight": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-292-10" }, "compact": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-292-10?view=compact", "representations": { "sv": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/praxis/c-292-10", "en": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/en/eu/praxis/c-292-10" }, "machine_languages": [ "en", "sv" ], "ref": "eu:c-292-10" }, "watch": { "risk": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=eu%3Ac-292-10", "relations": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/relations?id=eu%3Ac-292-10", "risk_changes": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk-changes", "node_state": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-state?id=eu%3Ac-292-10", "provenance": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-292-10" }, "metadata": { "schema": "novacopilot_object_metadata/1", "canonical_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-292-10", "source": "Source: NovaCopilot", "official_source": null, "short_answer": null, "short_answer_status": "not_in_register", "hash": "713747ad1a756014a7892577808ab20d976b2700e3b9479a39586288d4da2d62", "schema_version": "1", "last_verified_at": null, "verification_status": "not_verified_yet", "integrity_check_scope": "stored_content_only" }, "hash": "sha256:b19d5a2c41ca16f698d85f0e187d2968c845815c7314e455f077308cbb030cdc", "version": "legal-2026-10-27", "expires": "2026-10-28T00:00:00.000Z", "dependency": { "index_version": "legal-2026-10-27+legal-2026-10-27+2026-10-27T04:05:12", "content_hash": "sha256:b19d5a2c41ca16f698d85f0e187d2968c845815c7314e455f077308cbb030cdc", "revalidate_after": "2026-10-27T05:53:22.696Z", "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600, "policy": "revalidate-required; attribution-preferred", "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency", "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify", "stale_copy_invalid": true }, "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-292-10", "disclaimer": "Source reference with official identifier. Not legal advice and not a compliance decision.", "content_notice": { "legal_advice": false, "nature": "Source register. Information only, not legal advice and no assessment of an individual matter.", "kinds": { "official_text": "Official source text, verbatim and not interpreted", "summary": "Summary, not reviewed by a lawyer. Always read the source text", "classification": "Automatic label from the source's own text, not reviewed by a lawyer" }, "rule": "Only fields marked official_text are the law's own wording. Everything else points to it.", "report_error": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/corrections", "ai_act_declaration": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/ai-act-declaration" }, "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering", "withheld": { "links.evidence": 3 }, "access": { "status": "partner_key_required", "header": "x-partner-key", "contact": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/kontakt", "note": "Facts and counts are public. Relationships and decision paths stay inside NovaCopilot." }, "access_class": "relationship", "access_view": "public" }