{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-1-25-p",
    "cite_as": "NovaCopilot, legal.exploreworldai.com (https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-1-25-p)",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-10-18",
    "fingerprint": "ewai:se:fad94f",
    "proof": "sha256:6c74a863d994d7c0ae29720a5d096c82621c92584f6332fc021537d9aa7c6753",
    "jurisdiction": "se",
    "lang": "en",
    "publisher": "NovaCopilot by ExploreWorld Legal",
    "terms": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/om"
  },
  "brand_source": "Source: NovaCopilot",
  "object_type": "edge",
  "object_id": "edge:eu:c-1-25-p",
  "schema_version": "1",
  "schema": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/schemas/edge",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-1-25-p",
  "judgment": {
    "id": "eu:c-1-25-p",
    "text": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/judgment-text?id=eu:c-1-25-p"
  },
  "siblings": {
    "risk": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/risk/eu:c-1-25-p",
    "relation": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/relation/eu:c-1-25-p",
    "change": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/change/eu:c-1-25-p",
    "agent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/agent/eu:c-1-25-p",
    "provenance": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-1-25-p",
    "status": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/status/eu:c-1-25-p",
    "precedent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-1-25-p",
    "element": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/element/eu:c-1-25-p",
    "decision": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/decision/eu:c-1-25-p",
    "weight": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-1-25-p",
    "conflict": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-1-25-p",
    "citation_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-1-25-p"
  },
  "source": "NovaCopilot",
  "precedent_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/precedent-graph/eu:c-1-25-p",
  "item": {
    "judgment": "eu:c-1-25-p",
    "outgoing": [
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-1-25-p~follows~c-174-19",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-1-25-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-174/19",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_68"
        ],
        "excerpt": "It follows that the grounds and arguments put forward in an appeal made by the party which succeeded before the General Court in order to challenge the rejection, by that court, of certain pleas and arguments it submitted at first instance cannot procure an advantage for that party or be capable of ",
        "decided": "2026-10-15",
        "hash": "c3fe4d7227611084c2c86934860a390ca09e78950ecb695cb2e7a7e4b850fac3"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-1-25-p~follows~c-175-19",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-1-25-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-175/19",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_68"
        ],
        "excerpt": "It follows that the grounds and arguments put forward in an appeal made by the party which succeeded before the General Court in order to challenge the rejection, by that court, of certain pleas and arguments it submitted at first instance cannot procure an advantage for that party or be capable of ",
        "decided": "2026-10-15",
        "hash": "250c13808523b16236447772870b3dc30d3ff7c71faf901513e9a3b12444311a"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-1-25-p~follows~c-209-24",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-1-25-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-209/24",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_106",
          "para_110"
        ],
        "excerpt": "75 In that regard, it must be noted that, by its very nature, an ex aequo et bono assessment presupposes an overall consideration of the facts of the case concerned, on the basis of which the court, exercising broad discretion, proceeds to set a sum to serve as reparation of the damage which must be",
        "decided": "2026-10-15",
        "hash": "ce8a5315cd3abf4b2b5a0d2da8a0bc1422ddad1e5d0747083483c8532bd25f07"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-1-25-p~follows~c-243-18",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-1-25-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-243/18",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_100"
        ],
        "excerpt": "69 In that regard, it must be recalled, first, that it is apparent from the case-law that, in its unlimited jurisdiction, the General Court has the power, inter alia, to assess, taking account of all the circumstances of the case, damage caused by the administration according to the ex aequo et bono",
        "decided": "2026-10-15",
        "hash": "da6d42ea3c9951004e6454785416c9a44112f76ab36b4eaa3964bc0a7dea145a"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-1-25-p~follows~c-299-21",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-1-25-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-299/21",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_106"
        ],
        "excerpt": "75 In that regard, it must be noted that, by its very nature, an ex aequo et bono assessment presupposes an overall consideration of the facts of the case concerned, on the basis of which the court, exercising broad discretion, proceeds to set a sum to serve as reparation of the damage which must be",
        "decided": "2026-10-15",
        "hash": "54718d6741992c231c01401d2043567356ad8ba4874d8687c214c711d5757b79"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-1-25-p~follows~c-348-06",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-1-25-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-348/06",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_82",
          "para_84",
          "para_97",
          "para_100",
          "para_102",
          "para_103"
        ],
        "excerpt": "52 In accordance with paragraphs 67 and 73 of the judgment of 21 February 2008, Commission v Girardot (C-348/06 P, EU:C:2008:107), knowing which place the appellant would have obtained on the reserve list is irrelevant to determining the loss of earnings.",
        "decided": "2026-10-15",
        "hash": "182eaebdb80c071f5a9cc9bf82d081a7c4a6bfa7f3ff90b863092674977d03b7"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-1-25-p~follows~c-612-19",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-1-25-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-612/19",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_101"
        ],
        "excerpt": "70 Secondly, according to settled case-law, where the General Court has found that damage has been caused, it alone has jurisdiction to assess, within the limits of the claim, how and to what extent that damage should be compensated for, subject to the proviso that, in order to enable the Court of J",
        "decided": "2026-10-15",
        "hash": "35dfcee9f083da1319a897b5e54ad7a5d7ae00009b73d34e04bd533289d42c2e"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-1-25-p~follows~c-84-17",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-1-25-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-84/17",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_67",
          "para_111"
        ],
        "excerpt": "39 By contrast, a party is not entitled to bring an appeal against a judgment of the General Court which upheld its claims, even if that court rejected certain pleas put forward in support of those claims (see, to that effect, judgment of 25 July 2018, Société des produits Nestlé and Others v Mondel",
        "decided": "2026-10-15",
        "hash": "425cde577becb0f6db764bd2c8bb17b395c9bd0e2a8ce29ac147b3438cb69468"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-1-25-p~follows~c-849-25",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-1-25-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-849/25",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_67"
        ],
        "excerpt": "39 By contrast, a party is not entitled to bring an appeal against a judgment of the General Court which upheld its claims, even if that court rejected certain pleas put forward in support of those claims (see, to that effect, judgment of 25 July 2018, Société des produits Nestlé and Others v Mondel",
        "decided": "2026-10-15",
        "hash": "06bed48841a9b5af4adea34481c4f56d50f7424e406ffad2252423a6c6255578"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-1-25-p~follows~c-85-17",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-1-25-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-85/17",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_67",
          "para_111"
        ],
        "excerpt": "39 By contrast, a party is not entitled to bring an appeal against a judgment of the General Court which upheld its claims, even if that court rejected certain pleas put forward in support of those claims (see, to that effect, judgment of 25 July 2018, Société des produits Nestlé and Others v Mondel",
        "decided": "2026-10-15",
        "hash": "c52539d6aaa6d8ec6832d4577470d4b670f9127bb96be5b3af266fb9ce328053"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-1-25-p~follows~c-95-17",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-1-25-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-95/17",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_67",
          "para_111"
        ],
        "excerpt": "39 By contrast, a party is not entitled to bring an appeal against a judgment of the General Court which upheld its claims, even if that court rejected certain pleas put forward in support of those claims (see, to that effect, judgment of 25 July 2018, Société des produits Nestlé and Others v Mondel",
        "decided": "2026-10-15",
        "hash": "3c2e31c18ea83bdf9e76ee51e198920ff54e1e9b19898cd96b4d94cac16e23c2"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-1-25-p~follows~f-101-09",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-1-25-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "F-101/09",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_83",
          "para_121"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In the appellant’s view, that statement runs counter to the settled case-law that the loss of opportunity of filling a post and, consequently, of receiving a higher salary is material damage which must be compensated, as is apparent from the judgment of 13 September 2011, AA v Commission (F-101/09, ",
        "decided": "2026-10-15",
        "hash": "2f4769f00de288639658a14bb5553552173ce4277604bb68724eda8f6ff61cb8"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-1-25-p~follows~t-156-03",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-1-25-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "T-156/03",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_81"
        ],
        "excerpt": "51 Assuming that the alleged impossibility of determining that percentage is linked to it being impossible ‘to assert that, had the selection board been constituted in a more stable manner, the [appellant] would have been placed on the [reserve list]’, and to it being impossible ‘to ascertain the pl",
        "decided": "2026-10-15",
        "hash": "9802eaff878925cb8fb7850bdbb5651f7714268f5db44bc53349014dd315fd57"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-1-25-p~cites~c-1-25",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-1-25-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-1/25",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_4"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In Case C-1/25 P,",
        "decided": "2026-10-15",
        "hash": "420b763ccd7f5b30c79ffcb81397439e10646f2271216df2ffdd4011a6d0f845"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-1-25-p~cites~c-309-24",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-1-25-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-309/24",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_90"
        ],
        "excerpt": "If those grounds are vitiated by errors, those errors will vitiate the substantive legality of the decision, but not the statement of reasons in it, which may be adequate even though it sets out reasons which are incorrect (judgment of 5 March 2026, Passalacqua v Commission , C-309/24 P, EU:C:2026:1",
        "decided": "2026-10-15",
        "hash": "fac081d51639149277e17e7ddbf195dc0ce2b46755e708a2af95b440127f034b"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-1-25-p~cites~c-364-23",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-1-25-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-364/23",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_47"
        ],
        "excerpt": "It added that it preferred, in that regard, to wait for the outcome of the case which gave rise to the judgment of 12 June 2025, ZR v EUIPO (C-364/23 P, EU:C:2025:428).",
        "decided": "2026-10-15",
        "hash": "a33d74e3509e8eda327eb5fda2fb210ca7801961b550f953316a614d6f185e71"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-1-25-p~cites~c-4-24",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-1-25-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-4/24",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_91"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Contradictory or unintelligible reasoning in a judgment of the General Court amounts to a failure to state reasons (judgment of 13 November 2025, BNP Paribas Public Sector v SRB , C-4/24 P, EU:C:2025:879, paragraphs 91 and 92 and the case-law cited).",
        "decided": "2026-10-15",
        "hash": "4da0d27a8663cf0c04787cfc3673fda519c1ca8abf368727e36d203bbb1eb8bf"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-1-25-p~cites~c-570-18",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-1-25-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-570/18",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_65"
        ],
        "excerpt": "37 It must be recalled at the outset that it is for the Court to examine of its own motion any question relating to the admissibility of an appeal or the grounds of the appeal (judgment of 25 June 2020, HF v Parliament , C-570/18 P, EU:C:2020:490, paragraph 30 and the case-law cited).",
        "decided": "2026-10-15",
        "hash": "b2fd438fbbd8f3535e7f21818b75c24d2bf0e36632231764e411cb42010bc163"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-1-25-p~cites~t-10-02",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-1-25-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "T-10/02",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_84"
        ],
        "excerpt": "54 Accordingly, in her view, by finding, in paragraph 93 of the judgment under appeal, that the loss of opportunity suffered by the appellant could not be assessed in the light of the criteria set by the case-law arising from paragraphs 67 and 73 of the judgment of 21 February 2008, Commission v Gir",
        "decided": "2026-10-15",
        "hash": "aa6d567a9af8f3e0bb1b8c6ae5fbae079611139dd8f684a8d7d51348e5aeff2d"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-1-25-p~cites~t-286-15",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-1-25-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "T-286/15",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_119"
        ],
        "excerpt": "86 The General Court, she argues, has acknowledged in paragraph 261 of the judgment of 25 October 2018, KF v SatCen (T-286/15, EU:T:2018:718), the existence of non-material harm arising from a state of uncertainty, which might involve significant stress and strong feelings of injustice, such as refe",
        "decided": "2026-10-15",
        "hash": "d8265ae81feb39130f47f934d00667a88b6000cc0449af91309712c42baa9350"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-1-25-p~cites~t-548-18",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-1-25-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "T-548/18",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_44"
        ],
        "excerpt": "25 In the third place, EUIPO found that the principle of equal treatment had not been breached as a result of the treatment of the applicant in the case which gave rise to the judgment of 13 January 2021, Helbert v EUIPO (T-548/18, EU:T:2021:4), which also concerned a decision of the selection board",
        "decided": "2026-10-15",
        "hash": "fab9ee256edbf9b5ba9aadcaef234bc90459738b519c7d8727dd1a9a0ced4fb1"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-1-25-p~cites~t-610-18",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-1-25-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "T-610/18",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_19",
          "para_32",
          "para_35",
          "para_38",
          "para_44",
          "para_46",
          "para_47",
          "para_50",
          "para_75",
          "para_108",
          "para_111"
        ],
        "excerpt": "1 By her appeal, ZR seeks to have set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 23 October 2024, ZR v EUIPO (T-634/22, ‘the judgment under appeal’, EU:T:2024:746), by which it, first, upheld her action for annulment of the decision of the European Union Intellectual Property O",
        "decided": "2026-10-15",
        "hash": "6130c992c6f8cc9ae010e267787689d28d0d4289a5381a9babdec4298cc273e5"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-1-25-p~cites~t-634-22",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-1-25-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "T-634/22",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_19"
        ],
        "excerpt": "1 By her appeal, ZR seeks to have set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 23 October 2024, ZR v EUIPO (T-634/22, ‘the judgment under appeal’, EU:T:2024:746), by which it, first, upheld her action for annulment of the decision of the European Union Intellectual Property O",
        "decided": "2026-10-15",
        "hash": "72e0a0ddd5826424d10513cf7ca86b8f458eb5724acb275429809a1b6ab98138"
      }
    ],
    "incoming": [],
    "acts": [],
    "counts": {
      "outgoing": 23,
      "incoming": 0,
      "acts": 0
    },
    "follow": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-1-25-p?follow=5",
    "hash": "0888deab977c32755f97b48e1c8d51f2eaadf6b1dd0cb4a7526a5c9c264443d6"
  },
  "links": {
    "provisions": null,
    "case_law": {
      "precedent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-1-25-p",
      "conflict": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-1-25-p",
      "citation_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-1-25-p",
      "weight": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-1-25-p"
    },
    "compact": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-1-25-p?view=compact",
    "representations": {
      "sv": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/praxis/c-1-25-p",
      "en": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/en/eu/praxis/c-1-25-p"
    },
    "machine_languages": [
      "en",
      "sv"
    ],
    "ref": "eu:c-1-25-p"
  },
  "watch": {
    "changes": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/changes",
    "whats_new": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/whats-new?jurisdiction=eu",
    "conditional": "Send If-None-Match with the ETag; unchanged objects return 304 without body.",
    "recheck_after_seconds": 86400
  },
  "hash": "sha256:6c74a863d994d7c0ae29720a5d096c82621c92584f6332fc021537d9aa7c6753",
  "version": "legal-2026-10-18",
  "expires": "2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-10-18+legal-2026-10-18+2026-10-18T13:37:39",
    "content_hash": "sha256:6c74a863d994d7c0ae29720a5d096c82621c92584f6332fc021537d9aa7c6753",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-10-18T15:30:37.364Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; attribution-preferred",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-1-25-p",
  "disclaimer": "Source reference with official identifier. Not legal advice and not a compliance decision.",
  "content_notice": {
    "legal_advice": false,
    "nature": "Source register. Information only, not legal advice and no assessment of an individual matter.",
    "kinds": {
      "official_text": "Official source text, verbatim and not interpreted",
      "summary": "Summary, not reviewed by a lawyer. Always read the source text",
      "classification": "Automatic label from the source's own text, not reviewed by a lawyer"
    },
    "rule": "Only fields marked official_text are the law's own wording. Everything else points to it.",
    "report_error": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/corrections",
    "ai_act_declaration": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/ai-act-declaration"
  },
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering",
  "withheld": {
    "links.evidence": 3
  },
  "access": {
    "status": "partner_key_required",
    "header": "x-partner-key",
    "contact": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/kontakt",
    "note": "Facts and counts are public. Relationships and decision paths stay inside NovaCopilot."
  },
  "access_class": "relationship",
  "access_view": "public"
}