{ "attribution": { "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com", "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/decision/us:cafc-25-1807-2026-05-28", "cite_as": "NovaCopilot, legal.exploreworldai.com (https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/decision/us:cafc-25-1807-2026-05-28)", "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision", "version": "legal-2026-10-14", "fingerprint": "ewai:se:2c4638", "proof": "sha256:88ab3e2b7706806e8d5de077fe476144c6a3292ef555c4a75de1e8f726b9e97e", "jurisdiction": "se", "lang": "en", "publisher": "NovaCopilot by ExploreWorld Legal", "terms": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/om" }, "brand_source": "Source: NovaCopilot", "object_type": "decision", "object_id": "decision:us:cafc-25-1807-2026-05-28", "schema_version": "1", "schema": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/schemas/decision", "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/decision/us:cafc-25-1807-2026-05-28", "judgment": { "id": "us:cafc-25-1807-2026-05-28", "text": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/judgment-text?id=us:cafc-25-1807-2026-05-28" }, "siblings": { "risk": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/risk/us:cafc-25-1807-2026-05-28", "relation": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/relation/us:cafc-25-1807-2026-05-28", "change": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/change/us:cafc-25-1807-2026-05-28", "agent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/agent/us:cafc-25-1807-2026-05-28", "provenance": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/us:cafc-25-1807-2026-05-28", "status": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/status/us:cafc-25-1807-2026-05-28", "precedent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/us:cafc-25-1807-2026-05-28", "edge": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/us:cafc-25-1807-2026-05-28", "element": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/element/us:cafc-25-1807-2026-05-28", "weight": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/us:cafc-25-1807-2026-05-28", "conflict": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/us:cafc-25-1807-2026-05-28", "citation_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/us:cafc-25-1807-2026-05-28" }, "source": "NovaCopilot", "precedent_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/precedent-graph/us:cafc-25-1807-2026-05-28", "item": { "judgment": "us:cafc-25-1807-2026-05-28", "issue": "", "decisions": [ { "decision_id": "decision:us:cafc-25-1807-2026-05-28#1", "precedent_id": "precedent:us:cafc-25-1807-2026-05-28#1", "paragraph_id": "para_55", "outcome": "dismissed", "then": "We conclude that we have jurisdiction because the patent claims were effectively dismissed with prejudice.", "conditions": [], "exceptions": [], "elements": [], "open": [ "Inga uttryckliga villkor i rättsregeln; regeln gäller i den situation domen avser.", "Inga rekvisit ur lexikonet kunde knytas till regeln." ] }, { "decision_id": "decision:us:cafc-25-1807-2026-05-28#2", "precedent_id": "precedent:us:cafc-25-1807-2026-05-28#2", "paragraph_id": "para_347", "outcome": "holding", "then": "We conclude that even under the more demanding Merck standard, the statute of limitations expired before Insulet filed its complaint because the undisputed evidence shows that Insulet knew or should have known before the critical date the facts it needed to sufficiently plead a trade secret misappropriation claim against EOFlow.", "conditions": [], "exceptions": [], "elements": [], "open": [ "Inga uttryckliga villkor i rättsregeln; regeln gäller i den situation domen avser.", "Inga rekvisit ur lexikonet kunde knytas till regeln." ] }, { "decision_id": "decision:us:cafc-25-1807-2026-05-28#3", "precedent_id": "precedent:us:cafc-25-1807-2026-05-28#3", "paragraph_id": "para_727", "outcome": "holding", "then": "Access to Trade Secrets As to access, Insulet’s complaint alleged that its former employee Steve DiIanni was “entrusted with details of 7 As discussed below, since we conclude that the CAD-files trade secret is part of the design history file, we agree with EOFlow that it proved that the first misappropriation of the design history file occurred outside the limitations period.", "conditions": [], "exceptions": [], "elements": [], "open": [ "Inga uttryckliga villkor i rättsregeln; regeln gäller i den situation domen avser.", "Inga rekvisit ur lexikonet kunde knytas till regeln." ] }, { "decision_id": "decision:us:cafc-25-1807-2026-05-28#4", "precedent_id": "precedent:us:cafc-25-1807-2026-05-28#4", "paragraph_id": "para_992", "outcome": "holding", "then": "DiIanni’s 9 Because we conclude that the statute of limitations expired with respect to the design history file trade secret, we do not reach EOFlow’s argument that the design history file does not constitute a trade secret.", "conditions": [], "exceptions": [], "elements": [], "open": [ "Inga uttryckliga villkor i rättsregeln; regeln gäller i den situation domen avser.", "Inga rekvisit ur lexikonet kunde knytas till regeln." ] }, { "decision_id": "decision:us:cafc-25-1807-2026-05-28#5", "precedent_id": "precedent:us:cafc-25-1807-2026-05-28#5", "paragraph_id": "para_1022", "outcome": "holding", "then": "In summary, we conclude that the undisputed evidence establishes that the statute of limitations expired with respect to each trade secret before Insulet filed its complaint on August 3, 2023, and that the jury’s verdict to the contrary was unsupported by substantial evidence.", "conditions": [], "exceptions": [], "elements": [], "open": [ "Inga uttryckliga villkor i rättsregeln; regeln gäller i den situation domen avser.", "Inga rekvisit ur lexikonet kunde knytas till regeln." ] }, { "decision_id": "decision:us:cafc-25-1807-2026-05-28#6", "precedent_id": "precedent:us:cafc-25-1807-2026-05-28#6", "paragraph_id": "para_1168", "outcome": "holding", "then": "Rather, we conduct a detailed analysis of the Insulet testimony that allegedly supports a lack of access and similarity, and we conclude that it demonstrates a lack of substantial evidence to support the jury’s verdict.", "conditions": [], "exceptions": [], "elements": [], "open": [ "Inga uttryckliga villkor i rättsregeln; regeln gäller i den situation domen avser.", "Inga rekvisit ur lexikonet kunde knytas till regeln." ] }, { "decision_id": "decision:us:cafc-25-1807-2026-05-28#7", "precedent_id": "precedent:us:cafc-25-1807-2026-05-28#7", "paragraph_id": "para_203", "outcome": "reversed", "then": "As we reverse the liability judgment, Insulet’s First Circuit appeal is moot.", "conditions": [], "exceptions": [], "elements": [], "open": [ "Inga uttryckliga villkor i rättsregeln; regeln gäller i den situation domen avser.", "Inga rekvisit ur lexikonet kunde knytas till regeln." ] } ], "text_sha256": "c9a68ffe7d6c8420de601ccf8241ef8b43830879bc6d8de2d17af138235250a5", "method": "Rättsregeln delas i utfall, villkor (where, if, when, provided that) och undantag (unless, except where) med fasta regler.", "graph": { "graph_version": "1", "path": "topic → obligation → decision → sanction → compliance", "relations": [], "open": [ { "decision_id": "decision:us:cafc-25-1807-2026-05-28#1", "missing": [ "obligation", "sanction", "compliance" ], "reason": "Ingen säker registerkoppling via gemensamt rekvisit eller domens rättsakts-ID." }, { "decision_id": "decision:us:cafc-25-1807-2026-05-28#2", "missing": [ "obligation", "sanction", "compliance" ], "reason": "Ingen säker registerkoppling via gemensamt rekvisit eller domens rättsakts-ID." }, { "decision_id": "decision:us:cafc-25-1807-2026-05-28#3", "missing": [ "obligation", "sanction", "compliance" ], "reason": "Ingen säker registerkoppling via gemensamt rekvisit eller domens rättsakts-ID." }, { "decision_id": "decision:us:cafc-25-1807-2026-05-28#4", "missing": [ "obligation", "sanction", "compliance" ], "reason": "Ingen säker registerkoppling via gemensamt rekvisit eller domens rättsakts-ID." }, { "decision_id": "decision:us:cafc-25-1807-2026-05-28#5", "missing": [ "obligation", "sanction", "compliance" ], "reason": "Ingen säker registerkoppling via gemensamt rekvisit eller domens rättsakts-ID." }, { "decision_id": "decision:us:cafc-25-1807-2026-05-28#6", "missing": [ "obligation", "sanction", "compliance" ], "reason": "Ingen säker registerkoppling via gemensamt rekvisit eller domens rättsakts-ID." }, { "decision_id": "decision:us:cafc-25-1807-2026-05-28#7", "missing": [ "obligation", "sanction", "compliance" ], "reason": "Ingen säker registerkoppling via gemensamt rekvisit eller domens rättsakts-ID." }, { "decision_id": "all", "missing": [ "topic" ], "reason": "Ingen kuraterad ämneskoppling för beslutets regelverk." } ], "method": "Deterministisk koppling via permanenta rekvisit-ID:n, registrets rättsakts-ID:n och en kuraterad rättsakt-till-ämne-tabell. Inga relationer skapas med fritextgissning." }, "limits": [], "hash": "528e6da3676bceae0ec4765792c89b44eb8ee8daa56a66fa9834e4c50aca89f7" }, "links": { "provisions": null, "case_law": { "precedent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/us:cafc-25-1807-2026-05-28", "conflict": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/us:cafc-25-1807-2026-05-28", "citation_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/us:cafc-25-1807-2026-05-28", "weight": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/us:cafc-25-1807-2026-05-28" }, "evidence": { "provenance": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/us:cafc-25-1807-2026-05-28", "chain_verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/changes/verify", "object_changes": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/objects/changes" }, "compact": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/decision/us:cafc-25-1807-2026-05-28?view=compact", "representations": { "sv": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/us/praxis/cafc-25-1807-2026-05-28", "en": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/en/us/praxis/cafc-25-1807-2026-05-28" }, "machine_languages": [ "en", "sv" ], "ref": "us:cafc-25-1807-2026-05-28" }, "watch": { "changes": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/changes", "whats_new": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/whats-new?jurisdiction=us", "conditional": "Send If-None-Match with the ETag; unchanged objects return 304 without body.", "recheck_after_seconds": 86400 }, "hash": "sha256:88ab3e2b7706806e8d5de077fe476144c6a3292ef555c4a75de1e8f726b9e97e", "version": "legal-2026-10-14", "expires": "2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z", "dependency": { "index_version": "legal-2026-10-14+legal-2026-10-14+2026-10-14T17:18:31", "content_hash": "sha256:88ab3e2b7706806e8d5de077fe476144c6a3292ef555c4a75de1e8f726b9e97e", "revalidate_after": "2026-10-14T18:47:03.588Z", "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600, "policy": "revalidate-required; attribution-preferred", "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency", "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify", "stale_copy_invalid": true }, "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/decision/us:cafc-25-1807-2026-05-28", "disclaimer": "Source reference with official identifier. Not legal advice and not a compliance decision.", "content_notice": { "legal_advice": false, "nature": "Source register. Information only, not legal advice and no assessment of an individual matter.", "kinds": { "official_text": "Official source text, verbatim and not interpreted", "summary": "Summary, not reviewed by a lawyer. Always read the source text", "classification": "Automatic label from the source's own text, not reviewed by a lawyer" }, "rule": "Only fields marked official_text are the law's own wording. Everything else points to it.", "report_error": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/corrections", "ai_act_declaration": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/ai-act-declaration" }, "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering" }