{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/decision/eu:c-26-25",
    "cite_as": "NovaCopilot, legal.exploreworldai.com (https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/decision/eu:c-26-25)",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-10-19",
    "fingerprint": "ewai:se:c887fc",
    "proof": "sha256:eec6a4af8cba1e750a9933e4852bdbfd37766c68678fa71a430393590635cffe",
    "jurisdiction": "se",
    "lang": "en",
    "publisher": "NovaCopilot by ExploreWorld Legal",
    "terms": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/om"
  },
  "brand_source": "Source: NovaCopilot",
  "object_type": "decision",
  "object_id": "decision:eu:c-26-25",
  "schema_version": "1",
  "schema": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/schemas/decision",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/decision/eu:c-26-25",
  "judgment": {
    "id": "eu:c-26-25",
    "text": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/judgment-text?id=eu:c-26-25"
  },
  "siblings": {
    "risk": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/risk/eu:c-26-25",
    "relation": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/relation/eu:c-26-25",
    "change": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/change/eu:c-26-25",
    "agent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/agent/eu:c-26-25",
    "provenance": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-26-25",
    "status": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/status/eu:c-26-25",
    "precedent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-26-25",
    "edge": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-26-25",
    "element": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/element/eu:c-26-25",
    "weight": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-26-25",
    "conflict": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-26-25",
    "citation_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-26-25"
  },
  "source": "NovaCopilot",
  "precedent_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/precedent-graph/eu:c-26-25",
  "item": {
    "judgment": "eu:c-26-25",
    "issue": "Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the European Union – Article 20 TFEU – Family member of a Union citizen who has never exercised his or her right of freedom of movement – Area of freedom, security and justice – Border controls, asylum and immigration – Directive 2008/115/EC – Return of illegally staying third-country nationals – Threat to national security – Statement by a specialist national authority – Statement of reasons – Access to the file – Classified information – Primacy of EU law.",
    "decisions": [
      {
        "decision_id": "decision:eu:c-26-25#1",
        "precedent_id": "precedent:eu:c-26-25#1",
        "paragraph_id": "para_120",
        "outcome": "requires",
        "then": "what precisely must be understood by the “essence” of the confidential grounds on which that decision is based, having regard to Articles 41 and 47 of the Charter?’",
        "conditions": [
          {
            "text": "If the answer is in the affirmative",
            "elements": []
          }
        ],
        "exceptions": [],
        "elements": [],
        "open": [
          "Inga rekvisit ur lexikonet kunde knytas till regeln."
        ]
      },
      {
        "decision_id": "decision:eu:c-26-25#2",
        "precedent_id": "precedent:eu:c-26-25#2",
        "paragraph_id": "para_121",
        "outcome": "permits",
        "then": "40 By a decision of 26 May 2025, received at the Court on the same day, the referring court supplemented its request for a preliminary ruling.",
        "conditions": [],
        "exceptions": [],
        "elements": [],
        "open": [
          "Inga uttryckliga villkor i rättsregeln; regeln gäller i den situation domen avser.",
          "Inga rekvisit ur lexikonet kunde knytas till regeln."
        ]
      },
      {
        "decision_id": "decision:eu:c-26-25#3",
        "precedent_id": "precedent:eu:c-26-25#3",
        "paragraph_id": "para_122",
        "outcome": "requires",
        "then": "41 The referring court notes that, following that request, the Kúria (Supreme Court) issued, on 24 February 2025, a decision in the interest of a uniform interpretation of the law which is relevant to all immigration procedures. Any Hungarian court seised of an appeal against a return decision is required to apply the interpretation adopted by the Kúria (Supreme Court), without being able to depart from it, even",
        "conditions": [
          {
            "text": "if it provides reasons for its decision in that regard.",
            "elements": []
          }
        ],
        "exceptions": [],
        "elements": [],
        "open": [
          "Inga rekvisit ur lexikonet kunde knytas till regeln."
        ]
      },
      {
        "decision_id": "decision:eu:c-26-25#4",
        "precedent_id": "precedent:eu:c-26-25#4",
        "paragraph_id": "para_123",
        "outcome": "holding",
        "then": "42 The referring court is uncertain as to whether several aspects of that decision are compatible with EU law.",
        "conditions": [],
        "exceptions": [],
        "elements": [],
        "open": [
          "Inga uttryckliga villkor i rättsregeln; regeln gäller i den situation domen avser.",
          "Inga rekvisit ur lexikonet kunde knytas till regeln."
        ]
      },
      {
        "decision_id": "decision:eu:c-26-25#5",
        "precedent_id": "precedent:eu:c-26-25#5",
        "paragraph_id": "para_124",
        "outcome": "holding",
        "then": "43 In particular, it points out, in the first place, that it follows from that decision that a Hungarian court cannot examine the existence of a right of residence under Article 20 TFEU or of a relationship of dependency, for the first time, in the context of the judicial proceedings or",
        "conditions": [
          {
            "text": "where the person concerned has relied on them",
            "elements": []
          },
          {
            "text": "where facts establishing the need for such an examination are revealed in those proceedings. That examination is also precluded",
            "elements": []
          },
          {
            "text": "where the contested return decision has been preceded by another decision which refused that person’s right of residence in Hungary.",
            "elements": []
          }
        ],
        "exceptions": [],
        "elements": [],
        "open": [
          "Inga rekvisit ur lexikonet kunde knytas till regeln."
        ]
      },
      {
        "decision_id": "decision:eu:c-26-25#6",
        "precedent_id": "precedent:eu:c-26-25#6",
        "paragraph_id": "para_125",
        "outcome": "permits",
        "then": "44 In the second place, the referring court notes that, according to the Kúria (Supreme Court), in the Hungarian legislation as it stands, it is not possible to allow the person concerned access to the essence of the grounds of a decision taken against him or her, the only means compatible with existing national law which would ensure respect for that person’s rights would be for the court having jurisdiction to find that, since he or she is unable to access the relevant classified information, that person is unable to defend his or her rights and, consequently, to invite the public prosecutor",
        "conditions": [
          {
            "text": "where those grounds are based on classified information. In those circumstances",
            "elements": []
          },
          {
            "text": "if the public prosecutor decides not to intervene in the proceedings",
            "elements": []
          }
        ],
        "exceptions": [],
        "elements": [],
        "open": [
          "Inga rekvisit ur lexikonet kunde knytas till regeln."
        ]
      },
      {
        "decision_id": "decision:eu:c-26-25#7",
        "precedent_id": "precedent:eu:c-26-25#7",
        "paragraph_id": "para_126",
        "outcome": "holding",
        "then": "45 In the light of its doubts as to whether the decision of the Kúria (Supreme Court) of 24 February 2025 is compatible with EU law, the referring court is uncertain as to whether the effects conferred by Hungarian law on such a decision are compatible with EU law",
        "conditions": [
          {
            "text": "in so far as those effects prevent other divisions of the Kúria (Supreme Court) or the ordinary Hungarian courts from complying with EU law.",
            "elements": []
          }
        ],
        "exceptions": [],
        "elements": [],
        "open": [
          "Inga rekvisit ur lexikonet kunde knytas till regeln."
        ]
      },
      {
        "decision_id": "decision:eu:c-26-25#8",
        "precedent_id": "precedent:eu:c-26-25#8",
        "paragraph_id": "para_127",
        "outcome": "holding",
        "then": "46 On the basis of those factors, the Szegedi Törvényszék (Szeged High Court) added the following questions to those already put to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling:",
        "conditions": [],
        "exceptions": [],
        "elements": [],
        "open": [
          "Inga uttryckliga villkor i rättsregeln; regeln gäller i den situation domen avser.",
          "Inga rekvisit ur lexikonet kunde knytas till regeln."
        ]
      }
    ],
    "text_sha256": "1e01edfe785920d03cf48383b070db4825e323a9d881830b31f614b0ebe4ab40",
    "method": "Rättsregeln delas i utfall, villkor (where, if, when, provided that) och undantag (unless, except where) med fasta regler.",
    "graph": {
      "graph_version": "1",
      "path": "topic → obligation → decision → sanction → compliance",
      "relations": [],
      "open": [
        {
          "decision_id": "decision:eu:c-26-25#1",
          "missing": [
            "obligation",
            "sanction",
            "compliance"
          ],
          "reason": "Ingen säker registerkoppling via gemensamt rekvisit eller domens rättsakts-ID."
        },
        {
          "decision_id": "decision:eu:c-26-25#2",
          "missing": [
            "obligation",
            "sanction",
            "compliance"
          ],
          "reason": "Ingen säker registerkoppling via gemensamt rekvisit eller domens rättsakts-ID."
        },
        {
          "decision_id": "decision:eu:c-26-25#3",
          "missing": [
            "obligation",
            "sanction",
            "compliance"
          ],
          "reason": "Ingen säker registerkoppling via gemensamt rekvisit eller domens rättsakts-ID."
        },
        {
          "decision_id": "decision:eu:c-26-25#4",
          "missing": [
            "obligation",
            "sanction",
            "compliance"
          ],
          "reason": "Ingen säker registerkoppling via gemensamt rekvisit eller domens rättsakts-ID."
        },
        {
          "decision_id": "decision:eu:c-26-25#5",
          "missing": [
            "obligation",
            "sanction",
            "compliance"
          ],
          "reason": "Ingen säker registerkoppling via gemensamt rekvisit eller domens rättsakts-ID."
        },
        {
          "decision_id": "decision:eu:c-26-25#6",
          "missing": [
            "obligation",
            "sanction",
            "compliance"
          ],
          "reason": "Ingen säker registerkoppling via gemensamt rekvisit eller domens rättsakts-ID."
        },
        {
          "decision_id": "decision:eu:c-26-25#7",
          "missing": [
            "obligation",
            "sanction",
            "compliance"
          ],
          "reason": "Ingen säker registerkoppling via gemensamt rekvisit eller domens rättsakts-ID."
        },
        {
          "decision_id": "decision:eu:c-26-25#8",
          "missing": [
            "obligation",
            "sanction",
            "compliance"
          ],
          "reason": "Ingen säker registerkoppling via gemensamt rekvisit eller domens rättsakts-ID."
        },
        {
          "decision_id": "all",
          "missing": [
            "topic"
          ],
          "reason": "Ingen kuraterad ämneskoppling för beslutets regelverk."
        }
      ],
      "method": "Deterministisk koppling via permanenta rekvisit-ID:n, registrets rättsakts-ID:n och en kuraterad rättsakt-till-ämne-tabell. Inga relationer skapas med fritextgissning."
    },
    "limits": [],
    "hash": "09d3d7b425aa1d91269f306cc6bdf422a4bc13a4646d95d0d743b12bcb1fb5c5"
  },
  "links": {
    "provisions": null,
    "case_law": {
      "precedent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-26-25",
      "conflict": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-26-25",
      "citation_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-26-25",
      "weight": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-26-25"
    },
    "evidence": {
      "provenance": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-26-25",
      "chain_verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/changes/verify",
      "object_changes": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/objects/changes"
    },
    "compact": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/decision/eu:c-26-25?view=compact",
    "representations": {
      "sv": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/praxis/c-26-25",
      "en": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/en/eu/praxis/c-26-25"
    },
    "machine_languages": [
      "en",
      "sv"
    ],
    "ref": "eu:c-26-25"
  },
  "watch": {
    "changes": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/changes",
    "whats_new": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/whats-new?jurisdiction=eu",
    "conditional": "Send If-None-Match with the ETag; unchanged objects return 304 without body.",
    "recheck_after_seconds": 86400
  },
  "hash": "sha256:eec6a4af8cba1e750a9933e4852bdbfd37766c68678fa71a430393590635cffe",
  "version": "legal-2026-10-19",
  "expires": "2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-10-19+legal-2026-10-19+2026-10-19T10:10:13",
    "content_hash": "sha256:eec6a4af8cba1e750a9933e4852bdbfd37766c68678fa71a430393590635cffe",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-10-19T11:32:59.792Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; attribution-preferred",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/decision/eu:c-26-25",
  "disclaimer": "Source reference with official identifier. Not legal advice and not a compliance decision.",
  "content_notice": {
    "legal_advice": false,
    "nature": "Source register. Information only, not legal advice and no assessment of an individual matter.",
    "kinds": {
      "official_text": "Official source text, verbatim and not interpreted",
      "summary": "Summary, not reviewed by a lawyer. Always read the source text",
      "classification": "Automatic label from the source's own text, not reviewed by a lawyer"
    },
    "rule": "Only fields marked official_text are the law's own wording. Everything else points to it.",
    "report_error": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/corrections",
    "ai_act_declaration": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/ai-act-declaration"
  },
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}