{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rk-2012-2",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:36e45e3954d05eb78471cc9ce7d19c02709ccdaffe470e408ffd5546f402eec4",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RK 2012:2, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rk-2012-2",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rk-2012-2",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RK 2012:2, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Fråga om betydelsen av Post- och telestyrelsens tillvägagångssätt vid revidering av myndighetens s.k. hybridmodell för beräkning av kostnader som ska ligga till grund för kostnadsorienterade priser, när myndigheten senare löser en tvist om den förpliktade operatörens tillämpning av modellen.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Kammarrätten i Stockholm, 2012."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rk-2012-2",
  "softwareVersion": "fca2d9a0e86842d2",
  "citation": "avgorande-rk-2012-2, RK 2012:2, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rk-2012-2 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:65261d1fb5ed84c6, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rk-2012-2/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:36e45e3954d05eb78471cc9ce7d19c02709ccdaffe470e408ffd5546f402eec4",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:36e45e3954d05eb78471cc9ce7d19c02709ccdaffe470e408ffd5546f402eec4",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T06:01:23.739Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rk-2012-2",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}