{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rk-2009-1",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:a5a9b820fc9451653b68f1cc3512cb6c71aa7e64b5a65461eb34aacf4255fcee",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RK 2009:1, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rk-2009-1",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rk-2009-1",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RK 2009:1, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Fråga om bl.a. bevisbörda och beviskrav i mål om kostnadsorienterad prissättning i enlighet med LRIC-modellen, bl.a. vilken betydelse det har vid bedömningen av vad som är visat ifråga om vad en effektiv operatör skulle ha för kostnader för en viss tjänst att tjänsten upphandlats.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Kammarrätten i Stockholm, 2009."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rk-2009-1",
  "softwareVersion": "dec4b15429737075",
  "citation": "avgorande-rk-2009-1, RK 2009:1, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rk-2009-1 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:29e1f833b5cce6fb, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rk-2009-1/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:a5a9b820fc9451653b68f1cc3512cb6c71aa7e64b5a65461eb34aacf4255fcee",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:a5a9b820fc9451653b68f1cc3512cb6c71aa7e64b5a65461eb34aacf4255fcee",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T11:03:38.611Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rk-2009-1",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}