{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2025-29",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:6f5fa7c8d47909259fd82bbe5da92e6952e9f6fcdacb276b5c5f1496bc285d0b",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2025:29, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2025-29",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2025-29",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "Fråga om vite för utevaro kan dömas ut, när ett vittne som delgetts ett föreläggande att inställa sig personligen på egen begäran tillställts en ändrad kallelse att närvara via videolänk men inte delgetts den nya kallelsen",
  "abstract": [
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Göta hovrätt, 2025."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2025-29",
  "softwareVersion": "43d5e25ef122b9ac",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2025-29, RH 2025:29, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2025-29 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:383c723d572c086e, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2025-29/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:6f5fa7c8d47909259fd82bbe5da92e6952e9f6fcdacb276b5c5f1496bc285d0b",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:6f5fa7c8d47909259fd82bbe5da92e6952e9f6fcdacb276b5c5f1496bc285d0b",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T06:08:09.571Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2025-29",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}