{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2025-1",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:314e4062cdd68138d4da5b1d55b931cf01e9b475d410de86231da028eb7cf6aa",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2025:1, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2025-1",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2025-1",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2025:1, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Tvisteföremålets värde har uppgått till ett högt belopp men varken målets omfattning eller svårighetsgrad har vid en helhetsbedömning talat för att tingsrätten hade behövt avgöra målet med tre lagfarna domare.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: Tingsrätten har avgjort ett tvistemål med en lagfaren domare.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Göta hovrätt, 2025."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2025-1",
  "softwareVersion": "b19b80c2f2421df8",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2025-1, RH 2025:1, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2025-1 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:f002fa9437e36d62, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2025-1/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:314e4062cdd68138d4da5b1d55b931cf01e9b475d410de86231da028eb7cf6aa",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:314e4062cdd68138d4da5b1d55b931cf01e9b475d410de86231da028eb7cf6aa",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T06:08:39.496Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2025-1",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}