{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2023-50",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:4f4fefe66b5ab9cfa406e4c5f5252ffcf024790eb44bec5910047073651d649b",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2023:50, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2023-50",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2023-50",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2023:50, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Ett rättshjälpsbiträdes ersättning för utlägg och tidsspillan i samband med sammanträden har bestämts enligt schablonregeln och inte utifrån de faktiska kostnader ett biträde från huvudmannens bostadsort hade haft för liknande resor (jfr NJA 2012 s. 914 och NJA 2017 s. 629).",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Göta hovrätt, 2023."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2023-50",
  "softwareVersion": "e3bc737da2b5960d",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2023-50, RH 2023:50, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2023-50 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:3c0ce088c8bd2194, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2023-50/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:4f4fefe66b5ab9cfa406e4c5f5252ffcf024790eb44bec5910047073651d649b",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:4f4fefe66b5ab9cfa406e4c5f5252ffcf024790eb44bec5910047073651d649b",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T09:08:55.236Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2023-50",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}