{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2023-42",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:86ab6f8e61016cda412a57a8541ab795a3de6581270aeaac93cc8f8d2e87e2af",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2023:42, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2023-42",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2023-42",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2023:42, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Utifrån sammanhanget har det i tillräcklig utsträckning framgått att en handling över transportköp med sådant intyg som krävs för befrielse från stämpelskatt varit att betrakta även som en ansökan om lagfart och befrielse från stämpelskatt har beviljats.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: I den mån Lantmäteriet funnit ansökan oklar har det ålegat myndigheten att undanröja oklarheterna.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Göta hovrätt, 2023."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2023-42",
  "softwareVersion": "12bfd2970d89c02b",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2023-42, RH 2023:42, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2023-42 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:f52bab77ca443ccd, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2023-42/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:86ab6f8e61016cda412a57a8541ab795a3de6581270aeaac93cc8f8d2e87e2af",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:86ab6f8e61016cda412a57a8541ab795a3de6581270aeaac93cc8f8d2e87e2af",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:16:58.988Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2023-42",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}