{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2022-15",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:b38ca5f04277151f4279547be81def5629b077db0de542bc873615b4e1d72e41",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2022:15, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2022-15",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2022-15",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2022:15, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Klagan över domvilla.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: Sedan tingsrätten dömt en person för olaga intrång har fråga uppkommit om särskild åtalsprövning kan göras efter det att ordinarie preskriptionstid löpt ut och konsekvenserna av att prövningen inte gjorts inom den aktuella fristen.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Göta hovrätt, 2021."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2022-15",
  "softwareVersion": "a10a5e674f11ab25",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2022-15, RH 2022:15, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2022-15 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:257b32e5b6947c51, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2022-15/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:b38ca5f04277151f4279547be81def5629b077db0de542bc873615b4e1d72e41",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:b38ca5f04277151f4279547be81def5629b077db0de542bc873615b4e1d72e41",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T09:10:17.168Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2022-15",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}