{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2021-43",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:2fcf3129c739af11f1ff733c4213fc8d1a2100ab5251a53768c971c8709f22b3",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2021:43, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2021-43",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2021-43",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2021:43, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Den tilltalade har efter överklagande inte ansetts kunna begära frikännande dom i hovrätten.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: Sedan allmänt åtal lagts ned på den grund att det inte funnits tillräckliga skäl att den tilltalade gjort sig skyldig till brottet, har tingsrätten avskrivit målet från vidare handläggning.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Göta hovrätt, 2021."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2021-43",
  "softwareVersion": "ab62ddcc6ba9a039",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2021-43, RH 2021:43, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2021-43 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:14ee87c81a374dcd, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2021-43/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:2fcf3129c739af11f1ff733c4213fc8d1a2100ab5251a53768c971c8709f22b3",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:2fcf3129c739af11f1ff733c4213fc8d1a2100ab5251a53768c971c8709f22b3",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T12:06:22.454Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2021-43",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}