{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2021-41",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:6e6dd525281cfd170bae7c1a083d978e45a26b9151b1ae5df56007d26afc6132",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2021:41, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2021-41",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2021-41",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2021:41, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: En vårdnadshavare har ansetts ha rätt att väcka talan mot den andre vårdnadshavaren om boende och umgänge avseende parternas gemensamma barn, trots att vårdnadshavarna är gifta med varandra.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Göta hovrätt, 2021. Tillämpar Föräldrabalken."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2021-41",
  "softwareVersion": "2ca43a00625af41c",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2021-41, RH 2021:41, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2021-41 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:17ffbd93f3c7bfe8, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2021-41/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:6e6dd525281cfd170bae7c1a083d978e45a26b9151b1ae5df56007d26afc6132",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:6e6dd525281cfd170bae7c1a083d978e45a26b9151b1ae5df56007d26afc6132",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T11:59:54.756Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2021-41",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}