{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2021-40",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:9158c73c65a405c2344791e12e8c715c2496c6fcbed2baaf70c61e507fe665af",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2021:40, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2021-40",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2021-40",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2021:40, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Ett airsoftvapen har inte ansetts utgöra ett effektbegränsat skjutvapen som omfattas av vapenlagen då det inte varit utrett att det har en anslagsenergi på minst 0,2 joule.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Hovrätten för Västra Sverige, 2021."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2021-40",
  "softwareVersion": "a981d3d5fcf8f53a",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2021-40, RH 2021:40, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2021-40 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:f60876f1a46f3ec7, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2021-40/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:9158c73c65a405c2344791e12e8c715c2496c6fcbed2baaf70c61e507fe665af",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:9158c73c65a405c2344791e12e8c715c2496c6fcbed2baaf70c61e507fe665af",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T06:08:27.610Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2021-40",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}