{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2021-28",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:673b84b6ecadd401badc352257de75418d6d2abc60975fab8e7fd04905458d60",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2021:28, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2021-28",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2021-28",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2021:28, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Nya yrkanden som stöder sig på väsentligen samma grund har med hänsyn till principen om förbud mot reformatio in pejus inte fått framställas efter att tredskodom meddelats och sedan återvunnits.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Göta hovrätt, 2021."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2021-28",
  "softwareVersion": "ee0f2ac64c186c5c",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2021-28, RH 2021:28, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2021-28 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:eae3e855f84ade5e, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2021-28/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:673b84b6ecadd401badc352257de75418d6d2abc60975fab8e7fd04905458d60",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:673b84b6ecadd401badc352257de75418d6d2abc60975fab8e7fd04905458d60",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T09:09:58.747Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2021-28",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}