{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2021-10",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:e99061235f814fb86de2684f4ff04fa04423c1ca996d85be1489ac8fa9ef7c5d",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2021:10, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2021-10",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2021-10",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2021:10, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: En flygförsening orsakad av en ombordstigningsbrygga har inte ansetts utgöra en extraordinär omständighet eftersom lufttrafikföretaget inte visat att felet inte varit hänförligt till det aktuella flygplanets funktion eller dess besättnings agerande.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Hovrätten för Övre Norrland, 2021."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2021-10",
  "softwareVersion": "5d7da4c9dbbbf66f",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2021-10, RH 2021:10, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2021-10 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:14588a0023e983f7, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2021-10/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:e99061235f814fb86de2684f4ff04fa04423c1ca996d85be1489ac8fa9ef7c5d",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:e99061235f814fb86de2684f4ff04fa04423c1ca996d85be1489ac8fa9ef7c5d",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:17:57.281Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2021-10",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}