{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2019-46",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:1ae287483a6dafc8be21d620ef61f6848c637cf3ff040eec8c292d0e4b3981b6",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2019:46, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2019-46",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2019-46",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2019:46, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Parten återkallade därefter sin ansökan om verkställighet.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: Efter att en part ansökt om verkställighet av en tingsrätts interimistiska beslut rörande umgänge med barn, meddelade tingsrätten ett nytt interimistiskt beslut med innebörden att inget umgänge skulle ske.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Svea hovrätt, 2019. Tillämpar Föräldrabalken."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2019-46",
  "softwareVersion": "fa30c2f3dc46d0bb",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2019-46, RH 2019:46, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2019-46 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:af0bad52cf872a2f, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2019-46/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:1ae287483a6dafc8be21d620ef61f6848c637cf3ff040eec8c292d0e4b3981b6",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:1ae287483a6dafc8be21d620ef61f6848c637cf3ff040eec8c292d0e4b3981b6",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T06:06:14.409Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2019-46",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}