{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2019-43",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:cd08a2b2031f0e1e557ca2878043aa0f7ee03b5563da227be6c828dbdfcdac9e",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2019:43, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2019-43",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2019-43",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2019:43, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Hyresnämndsmål.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: Med hänsyn till hyresavtalets utformning och hur lägenheten, dvs. det uthyrda objektet, är beskaffad fann hovrätten att det är fråga om upplåtelse för verksamhet av institutionell natur och att bostadsmomentet får anses vara av underordnad betydelse i förhållande till denna verksamhet.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Svea hovrätts hyresrättsliga avgöranden, 2019."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2019-43",
  "softwareVersion": "75c120a41b31cc20",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2019-43, RH 2019:43, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2019-43 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:88ee45a3ff9eaafe, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2019-43/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:cd08a2b2031f0e1e557ca2878043aa0f7ee03b5563da227be6c828dbdfcdac9e",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:cd08a2b2031f0e1e557ca2878043aa0f7ee03b5563da227be6c828dbdfcdac9e",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T08:14:39.758Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2019-43",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}