{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2019-36",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:ad8a8760935d714c3d5f48d5df9984ab63ad7c9c4e1c7dc88d843232b32b5201",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2019:36, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2019-36",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2019-36",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2019:36, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Hyresnämndsmål.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: Hyresvärden yrkade att en hyresnämnd skulle föreläggas att handlägga ett ärende gällande godkännande av förbättringsarbeten med förtur och avgöra ärendet inom den tid som hovrätten fann skälig.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Svea hovrätts hyresrättsliga avgöranden, 2019. Tillämpar Förvaltningslagen."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2019-36",
  "softwareVersion": "816cf53db886f38d",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2019-36, RH 2019:36, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2019-36 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:9810cc8e90ff4807, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2019-36/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:ad8a8760935d714c3d5f48d5df9984ab63ad7c9c4e1c7dc88d843232b32b5201",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:ad8a8760935d714c3d5f48d5df9984ab63ad7c9c4e1c7dc88d843232b32b5201",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T06:07:08.549Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2019-36",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}