{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2018-7",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:c14e1f4be56e1d3c87c75600510923042a607ce2e36f1b0080d87593886133d6",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2018:7, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2018-7",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2018-7",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2018:7, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Den tilltalade har ansetts skyldig att återbetala kostnaden för provtagning och analys till staten.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: Hovrätten har funnit att den tilltalade inte ska dömas särskilt för brukande av narkotika när han samtidigt döms för innehav av narkotika (jfr NJA 2017 s. 415).",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Svea hovrätt, 2017."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2018-7",
  "softwareVersion": "faa32cb679ed4d88",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2018-7, RH 2018:7, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2018-7 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:46e6e4f79047563d, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2018-7/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:c14e1f4be56e1d3c87c75600510923042a607ce2e36f1b0080d87593886133d6",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:c14e1f4be56e1d3c87c75600510923042a607ce2e36f1b0080d87593886133d6",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T06:02:55.770Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2018-7",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}