{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2017-59",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:03019c4743c12ef7427faf8c8185b19c3f39a48338f5d1aa5017b67222b7fc7f",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2017:59, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2017-59",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2017-59",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2017:59, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Döda personer har ansetts kunna utgöra skyddade personer vid ansvar för krigsförbrytelse bestående i att en person dels poserat och låtit sig fotograferas vid dödade personer och intill en av de döda personernas avskilda huvud, dels publicerat några av fotografierna på Facebook.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Hovrätten över Skåne och Blekinge, 2017."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2017-59",
  "softwareVersion": "4ea0fedbbc5b0599",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2017-59, RH 2017:59, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2017-59 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:95bbb379dbdaf58f, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2017-59/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:03019c4743c12ef7427faf8c8185b19c3f39a48338f5d1aa5017b67222b7fc7f",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:03019c4743c12ef7427faf8c8185b19c3f39a48338f5d1aa5017b67222b7fc7f",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T06:02:37.689Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2017-59",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}