{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2017-54",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:3bcdf7e7e2fcb94b3f1e17c69fbc987cd6c9ae24463e5e68f3ae1ff7560fe9ff",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2017:54, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2017-54",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2017-54",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2017:54, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Hyresnämndsmål.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: Hovrätten har funnit att den omständigheten att det kan befaras att en fastighetsägare inte kommer att medverka vid ett förvaltningsåläggande inte innebär att det därmed saknas förutsättningar för att besluta om ett sådant åläggande.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Svea hovrätts hyresrättsliga avgöranden, 2017."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2017-54",
  "softwareVersion": "ec90aae1dec1d0ed",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2017-54, RH 2017:54, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2017-54 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:3b8d27f0e25e57e6, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2017-54/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:3bcdf7e7e2fcb94b3f1e17c69fbc987cd6c9ae24463e5e68f3ae1ff7560fe9ff",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:3bcdf7e7e2fcb94b3f1e17c69fbc987cd6c9ae24463e5e68f3ae1ff7560fe9ff",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:11:08.230Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2017-54",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}