{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2017-50",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:11b6996ae6df233df9224a5b202f22e1817b0726c0e78feced9c7e3011a59c11",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2017:50, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2017-50",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2017-50",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2017:50, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Hyresnämndsmål.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: Hovrätten konstaterade att de nya hyresgästerna visserligen skulle påverkas av rättskraften i ett avgörande mellan hyresvärden och de tidigare hyresgästerna men avslog ansökan om intervention med hänsyn till att rättskraftens utsträckning var hänförlig till de tidigare hyresgästernas civilrättsliga rätt att förfoga över tvisteföremålet.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Svea hovrätts hyresrättsliga avgöranden, 2017."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2017-50",
  "softwareVersion": "6fc4e6dff07590c0",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2017-50, RH 2017:50, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2017-50 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:6782378899fb9a2a, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2017-50/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:11b6996ae6df233df9224a5b202f22e1817b0726c0e78feced9c7e3011a59c11",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:11b6996ae6df233df9224a5b202f22e1817b0726c0e78feced9c7e3011a59c11",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T06:02:26.224Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2017-50",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}