{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2017-30",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:48890f88befca1174e8a4129e8c010945c7bf1344144ca3e06dfe382eae327fa",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2017:30, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2017-30",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2017-30",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2017:30, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Grovt vapenbrott har i sig ansetts utgöra ett sådant verkligt, faktiskt och tillräckligt allvarligt hot mot ett grundläggande samhällsintresse att utgångspunkten bör vara att en gärningsman ska utvisas från Sverige, även om han eller hon därigenom får sin rätt till fri rörlighet inom EES-området begränsad.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Svea hovrätt, 2017. Tillämpar Utlänningslagen."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2017-30",
  "softwareVersion": "ff3272a6b1a45707",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2017-30, RH 2017:30, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2017-30 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:111f8a3f40bd09c7, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2017-30/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:48890f88befca1174e8a4129e8c010945c7bf1344144ca3e06dfe382eae327fa",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:48890f88befca1174e8a4129e8c010945c7bf1344144ca3e06dfe382eae327fa",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T06:02:37.365Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2017-30",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}