{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2016-75",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:a25e13cac9bf7625635ae073237b8fae42b0c133199fb788337a1db7f3fd73b6",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2016:75, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2016-75",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2016-75",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2016:75, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Hyresnämndsmål.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: Hovrätten har funnit att ett sammanboende under två och ett halvt år inte uppfyller varaktighetsrekvisitet och att moderns flytt till vårdhemmet inte utgjorde en sådan plötslig och oförutsedd händelse som skulle kunna leda till att varaktighetsrekvisitet trots allt var uppfyllt.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Svea hovrätts hyresrättsliga avgöranden, 2016."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2016-75",
  "softwareVersion": "28fe6a0b1f5c94ff",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2016-75, RH 2016:75, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2016-75 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:03bd577b6baff3bd, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2016-75/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:a25e13cac9bf7625635ae073237b8fae42b0c133199fb788337a1db7f3fd73b6",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:a25e13cac9bf7625635ae073237b8fae42b0c133199fb788337a1db7f3fd73b6",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T08:57:38.038Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2016-75",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}