{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2016-33",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:5d46833e7d783c096f4d098ec7ddf11727533954c041f66c655978c6b126b5e8",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2016:33, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2016-33",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2016-33",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2016:33, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Beviskravet har utformats så att gåvogivaren ska göra detta övervägande sannolikt.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: Vid påstående om innehållsförfalskning av gåvobrev har gåvogivaren ansetts ha bevisbördan för att handlingens text har ändrats efter undertecknandet och sålunda inte gett uttryck för någon gåvoavsikt.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Svea hovrätt, 2016. Tillämpar Avtalslagen."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2016-33",
  "softwareVersion": "b4a58244b658156c",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2016-33, RH 2016:33, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2016-33 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:1e13c07ea242188f, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2016-33/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:5d46833e7d783c096f4d098ec7ddf11727533954c041f66c655978c6b126b5e8",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:5d46833e7d783c096f4d098ec7ddf11727533954c041f66c655978c6b126b5e8",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:04:02.847Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2016-33",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}