{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2015-63",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:bba327f8ee9d584e930d9b2516b67d9b7fd0de4c665ad334151f5624f27a5582",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2015:63, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2015-63",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2015-63",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "Fråga om Stockholms Handelskammares Skiljedomsinstitut inte iakttog likabehandlingsprincipen genom att utse en skiljeman som käranden tidigare hade utsett, men inte någon av de två skiljemän som svarandeparterna var för sig hade utsett",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Klander av skiljedom.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Svea hovrätt, 2015."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2015-63",
  "softwareVersion": "1016e135bb923777",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2015-63, RH 2015:63, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2015-63 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:c610a05710ffaf41, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2015-63/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:bba327f8ee9d584e930d9b2516b67d9b7fd0de4c665ad334151f5624f27a5582",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:bba327f8ee9d584e930d9b2516b67d9b7fd0de4c665ad334151f5624f27a5582",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:05:55.052Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2015-63",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}