{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2015-52",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:6b4c316dad842fc5645623611d59635b3df87febeaf983414f02078ef32f2e16",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2015:52, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2015-52",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2015-52",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2015:52, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: När, vid upplösningen av ett samboförhållande, den ena sambon självmant flyttar från en gemensamt ägd bostadsrättslägenhet, har den flyttande sambon ansetts betalningsskyldig till den andra sambon för bostadsrättens kostnader, fram till dess att bostadsrätten kunnat säljas, oaktat att den andra sambon ensam bott kvar i lägenheten.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Göta hovrätt, 2015. Tillämpar Äktenskapsbalken, Sambolagen."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2015-52",
  "softwareVersion": "ad8b63b228f33ad4",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2015-52, RH 2015:52, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2015-52 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:f0d0e9de0b86a270, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2015-52/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:6b4c316dad842fc5645623611d59635b3df87febeaf983414f02078ef32f2e16",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:6b4c316dad842fc5645623611d59635b3df87febeaf983414f02078ef32f2e16",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:09:54.069Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2015-52",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}