{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2015-44",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:3d69f3dc921342f1426b436f3402a7f5bfa12961f92aad2d36156187e3b13600",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2015:44, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2015-44",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2015-44",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2015:44, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Kärandena var ägare till en timmerstuga belägen på Kronans överloppsmark.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: Då bearbetningen av stugan har ansetts vara så genomgripande att svarandena förvärvat äganderätten till den genom s.k. specifikation, har kärandenas talan om bättre rätt till stugan och om handräckning lämnats utan bifall.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Hovrätten för Övre Norrland, 2014."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2015-44",
  "softwareVersion": "5790640b15094595",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2015-44, RH 2015:44, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2015-44 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:10eeb8e2bce34518, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2015-44/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:3d69f3dc921342f1426b436f3402a7f5bfa12961f92aad2d36156187e3b13600",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:3d69f3dc921342f1426b436f3402a7f5bfa12961f92aad2d36156187e3b13600",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T09:07:32.996Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2015-44",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}