{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2015-42",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:1a27f01be0dfcfbc48cedce4b6825520d4987648cc644327a58571faf0d599d1",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2015:42, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2015-42",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2015-42",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2015:42, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: I den mån ett aktiebolags ansvar mot en borgenär bortfallit på grund av preskription, kan borgenären inte med framgång vända sig till den som är medansvarig för bolagets förpliktelser enligt 25 kap. 18 § eller 19 § aktiebolagslagen (2005:551).",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Svea hovrätt, 2015. Tillämpar ABL."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2015-42",
  "softwareVersion": "d8ba206cad99ff68",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2015-42, RH 2015:42, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2015-42 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:fa0ffa094d816a33, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2015-42/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:1a27f01be0dfcfbc48cedce4b6825520d4987648cc644327a58571faf0d599d1",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:1a27f01be0dfcfbc48cedce4b6825520d4987648cc644327a58571faf0d599d1",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:11:25.823Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2015-42",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}