{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2012-55",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:555bf02dcdc30078b4d72153ec3ddbc731a51720b24e9bb333b8e0ea7d6a6070",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2012:55, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2012-55",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2012-55",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2012:55, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Hyresnämndsmål.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: Villkor vid förvärv av två fastigheter innebärande att båda fastigheterna måste förvärvas har inte ansetts uppenbart oskäliga mot den bostadsrättsförening som anmält intresse av att förvärva fastigheterna.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Svea hovrätts hyresrättsliga avgöranden, 2012."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2012-55",
  "softwareVersion": "d4b45f4b6947b1ef",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2012-55, RH 2012:55, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2012-55 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:28d7afbc0fd22734, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2012-55/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:555bf02dcdc30078b4d72153ec3ddbc731a51720b24e9bb333b8e0ea7d6a6070",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:555bf02dcdc30078b4d72153ec3ddbc731a51720b24e9bb333b8e0ea7d6a6070",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:04:07.437Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2012-55",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}