{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2012-35",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:dffb1f7d516ab74de124ad0e91af6f4a6a4b55f0cefee0c0c41cbcefb85f4b34",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2012:35, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2012-35",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2012-35",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2012:35, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Hovrätten har funnit att innehav av 6,84 gram cannabisharts vid intagningen till en kriminalvårdsanstalt, trots avsikt att ta med sig narkotikan in på anstalten, ska rubriceras som narkotikabrott, ringa brott, eftersom risken för upptäckt varit uppenbar.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Svea hovrätt, 2012."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2012-35",
  "softwareVersion": "20e139dad46af168",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2012-35, RH 2012:35, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2012-35 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:d04b6abdb60a6c36, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2012-35/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:dffb1f7d516ab74de124ad0e91af6f4a6a4b55f0cefee0c0c41cbcefb85f4b34",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:dffb1f7d516ab74de124ad0e91af6f4a6a4b55f0cefee0c0c41cbcefb85f4b34",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T08:56:48.947Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2012-35",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}