{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2011-64",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:351aa88936406161f3a24673010ef9dd40237a26d887b486e6ee316c73e0ae06",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2011:64, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2011-64",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2011-64",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2011:64, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Straffmätning i mål om grov misshandel.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: Även fråga om angivelse kan anses vara frivillig när den tilltalade först lämnat sitt erkännande till en terapeut som haft anmälningsskyldighet och betydelsen av sådan angivelse för straffmätningen.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Hovrätten för Nedre Norrland, 2011."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2011-64",
  "softwareVersion": "72732d3db0c4df37",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2011-64, RH 2011:64, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2011-64 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:521728e4ebc6f55c, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2011-64/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:351aa88936406161f3a24673010ef9dd40237a26d887b486e6ee316c73e0ae06",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:351aa88936406161f3a24673010ef9dd40237a26d887b486e6ee316c73e0ae06",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:58:11.143Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2011-64",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}