{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2011-4",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:a7128e46ea0fd731e92f444d842819a83bc2f49938faa57037c070d935491718",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2011:4, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2011-4",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2011-4",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2011:4, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Målet har återförvisats till tingsrätten.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: I mål om våld mot tjänsteman m.m. har tingsrätten funnit att saken kunnat utredas tillfredställande och avgjort målet trots att den tilltalade, som förnekat brott, ej varit närvarande.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Hovrätten för Västra Sverige, 2010."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2011-4",
  "softwareVersion": "2fddb276792500e9",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2011-4, RH 2011:4, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2011-4 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:55cf09dc5fda8dfd, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2011-4/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:a7128e46ea0fd731e92f444d842819a83bc2f49938faa57037c070d935491718",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:a7128e46ea0fd731e92f444d842819a83bc2f49938faa57037c070d935491718",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:57:05.057Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2011-4",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}