{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2011-39",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:f99375ee7386ac9efb175c200f4fb0492f90a83b123a0cb37f11851017a0ac9a",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2011:39, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2011-39",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2011-39",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2011:39, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Part, som fått fullt bifall till sina yrkanden i tingsrätten, har i ärende om överflyttning av barn enligt lagen (1989:14) om erkännande och verkställighet av utländska vårdnadsavgöranden m.m. och om överflyttning av barn tillåtits att överklaga med ett nytt yrkande om att barnen skulle hämtas genom polismyndighetens försorg.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Svea hovrätt, 2011."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2011-39",
  "softwareVersion": "786eddb7ee24a090",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2011-39, RH 2011:39, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2011-39 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:999e3c3495e8f426, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2011-39/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:f99375ee7386ac9efb175c200f4fb0492f90a83b123a0cb37f11851017a0ac9a",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:f99375ee7386ac9efb175c200f4fb0492f90a83b123a0cb37f11851017a0ac9a",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:55:03.563Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2011-39",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}