{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2010-8",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:9c3a53c525aca6b50638d9dfdcedd3d467c20903388bfd99e2c6ca6b5d689e48",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2010:8, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2010-8",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2010-8",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2010:8, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Vid flerfaldig brottslighet avseende narkotikasmuggling bör enbart den omständigheten att den dömde har fört in narkotikan vid två olika resor inte medföra att brottslighetens straffvärde bedöms lägre än om narkotikan hade smugglats in vid ett och samma tillfälle.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Hovrätten över Skåne och Blekinge, 2010."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2010-8",
  "softwareVersion": "07df3dd49b4bd525",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2010-8, RH 2010:8, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2010-8 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:36ae64dbea0eb94b, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2010-8/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:9c3a53c525aca6b50638d9dfdcedd3d467c20903388bfd99e2c6ca6b5d689e48",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:9c3a53c525aca6b50638d9dfdcedd3d467c20903388bfd99e2c6ca6b5d689e48",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T10:57:14.268Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2010-8",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}