{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2010-63",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:3f3fc493a312f239241667f165b64413598dfc492a1b4e45a18b0b3203cde23b",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2010:63, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2010-63",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2010-63",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2010:63, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Hovrätten har funnit att det inte förelegat tillräckliga skäl att jämka lägsta dagsbotsbelopp för asylsökande som ådömts 130 dagsböter och som, såvitt framkommit, inte haft från andra asylsökande avvikande ekonomisk eller social situation.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Hovrätten för Övre Norrland, 2010."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2010-63",
  "softwareVersion": "ca556a49e3e27711",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2010-63, RH 2010:63, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2010-63 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:d9c3824c02f9aa16, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2010-63/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:3f3fc493a312f239241667f165b64413598dfc492a1b4e45a18b0b3203cde23b",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:3f3fc493a312f239241667f165b64413598dfc492a1b4e45a18b0b3203cde23b",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T06:05:08.842Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2010-63",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}