{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2010-30",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:640b11d24a4bbd8bea86be0f0d870881961cc5fbbd9600f8cf4caadb09acae45",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2010:30, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2010-30",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2010-30",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2010:30, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Vid bedömning av konkurrerande skadeorsaker i mål om trafikskadeersättning har de iakttagelser som gjorts av behandlande läkare, som behandlat den skadade både före och efter trafikolyckan, ansetts väga tyngre än den bedömning som försäkringsbolagets läkare gjort utifrån journalanteckningar.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Hovrätten för Övre Norrland, 2010."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2010-30",
  "softwareVersion": "766b252abd293e3d",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2010-30, RH 2010:30, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2010-30 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:f04134fad5164fa4, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2010-30/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:640b11d24a4bbd8bea86be0f0d870881961cc5fbbd9600f8cf4caadb09acae45",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:640b11d24a4bbd8bea86be0f0d870881961cc5fbbd9600f8cf4caadb09acae45",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T09:06:53.688Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2010-30",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}