{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2010-26",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:947d38e33401eb27449601419092d5b8603a457a354d332012455b86f4e747ec",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2010:26, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2010-26",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2010-26",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2010:26, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Åtal för grovt rattfylleri har efter invändning om s.k. eftersupning ogillats med hänvisning till bl.a. att ett underlag innefattande enbart två blodprov tagna med en timmes mellanrum inte utgjorde tillräcklig bevisning för fällande dom.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Hovrätten för Västra Sverige, 2009."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2010-26",
  "softwareVersion": "5954bb8cb0a3fe54",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2010-26, RH 2010:26, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2010-26 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:c6fde19121a2edc4, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2010-26/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:947d38e33401eb27449601419092d5b8603a457a354d332012455b86f4e747ec",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:947d38e33401eb27449601419092d5b8603a457a354d332012455b86f4e747ec",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:15:32.054Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2010-26",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}