{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2010-19",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:9bc765cbd5674b366b0ff5f2ad1c2423dca86cc8223c38724fcd1c005b8a7f40",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2010:19, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2010-19",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2010-19",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2010:19, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Trots att en borgenär sänt ett flertal kravbrev till en gäldenär under dennes vid var tid gällande folkbokföringsadress har hovrätten ansett att borgenären med hänsyn till omständigheterna inte styrkt preskriptionsavbrott.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Svea hovrätt, 2010."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2010-19",
  "softwareVersion": "95e576b7a1f1b2a8",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2010-19, RH 2010:19, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2010-19 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:e0d803a5c6138daa, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2010-19/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:9bc765cbd5674b366b0ff5f2ad1c2423dca86cc8223c38724fcd1c005b8a7f40",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:9bc765cbd5674b366b0ff5f2ad1c2423dca86cc8223c38724fcd1c005b8a7f40",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T09:08:19.655Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2010-19",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}