{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2009-54",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:26bf15b0af9fb999960c459cc5cb0e7724f2adc0f048d7f764272d93724c7d60",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2009:54, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2009-54",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2009-54",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2009:54, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Underlåtenhet att upprätta årsredovisning i ett sedan många år vilande aktiebolag har, eftersom det inte funnits någon krets av intressenter som ur borgenärsperspektiv eller av andra skäl haft anledning att ta del av årsredovisningen, ej föranlett ansvar för bokföringsbrott.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Hovrätten för Västra Sverige, 2008."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2009-54",
  "softwareVersion": "a33de0983719cf16",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2009-54, RH 2009:54, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2009-54 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:69ed6a2d7a7f5b54, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2009-54/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:26bf15b0af9fb999960c459cc5cb0e7724f2adc0f048d7f764272d93724c7d60",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:26bf15b0af9fb999960c459cc5cb0e7724f2adc0f048d7f764272d93724c7d60",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T09:10:17.461Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2009-54",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}