{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2009-53",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:e2a1ceb3142093c11b651c63cd8ae891b040a98cacc93fb27099f6e903ea9c71",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2009:53, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2009-53",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2009-53",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2009:53, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Åtal för hastighetsöverträdelse har ogillats eftersom förseelsen bedömts vara ursäktlig med hänsyn bl.a. till att föraren på grund av särskilda omständigheter ej haft anledning att ifrågasätta att bilens hastighetsmätare fungerat korrekt.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Hovrätten för Västra Sverige, 2009."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2009-53",
  "softwareVersion": "2be3d399d185956d",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2009-53, RH 2009:53, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2009-53 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:5633bce8dceed215, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2009-53/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:e2a1ceb3142093c11b651c63cd8ae891b040a98cacc93fb27099f6e903ea9c71",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:e2a1ceb3142093c11b651c63cd8ae891b040a98cacc93fb27099f6e903ea9c71",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:12:58.053Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2009-53",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}