{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2009-32",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:422f16eab41836bce3bf0ded065b31964d03b285bcd2aa413405a0ade177b5da",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2009:32, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2009-32",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2009-32",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2009:32, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Laga kraften hos en av lantmäterimyndigheten utfärdad delfaktura avseende förrättning i ett fastighetsbildningsmål har bedömts vara begränsad till att omfatta vad som vid tiden för utfärdandet av delfakturan går att bedöma och inkluderar inte skäligheten av den totala förrättningskostnaden.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Hovrätten för Västra Sverige, 2009."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2009-32",
  "softwareVersion": "d9491355beaba8a1",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2009-32, RH 2009:32, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2009-32 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:ebcb21257145dae8, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2009-32/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:422f16eab41836bce3bf0ded065b31964d03b285bcd2aa413405a0ade177b5da",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:422f16eab41836bce3bf0ded065b31964d03b285bcd2aa413405a0ade177b5da",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T10:04:13.712Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2009-32",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}