{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2008-72",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:0614c894e046a211a51b5524d5217f71f77b99625f0cd13326155cb0595604f0",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2008:72, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2008-72",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2008-72",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2008:72, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Efter överklagande biföll hovrätten åtalet och förordnade om beslag av sprängmedlet.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: Tingsrätten ogillade ett åtal för brott mot lagen om brandfarliga och explosiva varor och hävde till följd härav ett beslag av föremål (sprängmedel) som förvarades hos polismyndighet.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Svea hovrätt, 2008."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2008-72",
  "softwareVersion": "f2853b582cc7d5bd",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2008-72, RH 2008:72, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2008-72 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:d2d0b1c84b9e83b7, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2008-72/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:0614c894e046a211a51b5524d5217f71f77b99625f0cd13326155cb0595604f0",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:0614c894e046a211a51b5524d5217f71f77b99625f0cd13326155cb0595604f0",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:07:04.839Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2008-72",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}