{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2008-60",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:ba496d77c267eaf99775d46975fb6b66e70d033f3a36dc2f1703c1ccb951dc84",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2008:60, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2008-60",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2008-60",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2008:60, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Tryckfrihetsmål.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: Publicering av en insändare innehållande uppgift som varit ägnad att utsätta företagaren för andras missaktning har ansetts försvarlig med hänsyn till intresset av att fritt få framföra kritiska åsikter om förmedlingsverksamheten.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Hovrätten för Nedre Norrland, 2008."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2008-60",
  "softwareVersion": "718b7c2a8b5b951d",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2008-60, RH 2008:60, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2008-60 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:7004c6a2dcb9c214, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2008-60/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:ba496d77c267eaf99775d46975fb6b66e70d033f3a36dc2f1703c1ccb951dc84",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:ba496d77c267eaf99775d46975fb6b66e70d033f3a36dc2f1703c1ccb951dc84",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T10:58:05.627Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2008-60",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}