{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2008-54",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:4d351ad255088b2c4fe96dafa0b599d7de96e53cb9cc35fa317cd4d016badd83",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2008:54, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2008-54",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2008-54",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2008:54, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: En man förs bort i en bil, misshandlas och krävs på pengar.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: Vid bevisvärderingen har en tilltalads vägran att svara på frågor (\"the right to silence\") inte tillagts bevisvärde samt ett antal s.k. kringomständigheter inte ansetts tillräckliga för att åtalet för anstiftansbrott skall anses styrkt.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Hovrätten för Västra Sverige, 2007."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2008-54",
  "softwareVersion": "89e884b91cd0fa97",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2008-54, RH 2008:54, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2008-54 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:981b3cfb5d7b6edd, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2008-54/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:4d351ad255088b2c4fe96dafa0b599d7de96e53cb9cc35fa317cd4d016badd83",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:4d351ad255088b2c4fe96dafa0b599d7de96e53cb9cc35fa317cd4d016badd83",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:15:35.236Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2008-54",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}