{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2007-77",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:b0cc3f13ffd2c2a2b228ac5ad8ef59af65631fe0ed8c6099505ee83561634d94",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2007:77, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2007-77",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2007-77",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2007:77, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Frivillig angivelse.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: Presumtion för fängelse med hänsyn till straffvärdet har inte ansetts föreligga när längden av det fängelsestraff som skulle dömas ut, om fängelse valdes som påföljd, har understigit fängelse ett år.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Hovrätten över Skåne och Blekinge, 2007."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2007-77",
  "softwareVersion": "95829f818a506aa1",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2007-77, RH 2007:77, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2007-77 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:7bfad61a283ce9ad, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2007-77/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:b0cc3f13ffd2c2a2b228ac5ad8ef59af65631fe0ed8c6099505ee83561634d94",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:b0cc3f13ffd2c2a2b228ac5ad8ef59af65631fe0ed8c6099505ee83561634d94",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T08:11:19.143Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2007-77",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}