{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2007-34",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:e40ccb3e20180468421dceb9a6f4a60ab12fc3dddecdebfd8cc3acac02ccebec",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2007:34, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2007-34",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2007-34",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "Fråga om en stämningsansökan skall avvisas på grund av res judicata då utslag tidigare meddelats av kronfogdemyndigheten efter att borgenären har ansökt om betalningsföreläggande avseende en del av den faktura på vilken talan grundas",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Frågan har besvarats jakande.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Hovrätten för Nedre Norrland, 2007."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2007-34",
  "softwareVersion": "1f890d2ab4244685",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2007-34, RH 2007:34, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2007-34 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:649609cc17e36696, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2007-34/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:e40ccb3e20180468421dceb9a6f4a60ab12fc3dddecdebfd8cc3acac02ccebec",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:e40ccb3e20180468421dceb9a6f4a60ab12fc3dddecdebfd8cc3acac02ccebec",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T06:04:18.568Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2007-34",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}