{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2006-64",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:3feef616c2dc89d2cb7059360acf78e2a1142604a0f6ab396d65c448cff65fcd",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2006:64, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2006-64",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2006-64",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2006:64, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Fängelsestraffets längd har för en artonåring som skall dömas för grovt narkotikabrott reducerats inte bara med hänsyn till hans ungdom utan även med hänsyn till att hans befattning med narkotikan varit begränsad, av inte särskilt kvalificerad art och motiverats av rädsla.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Hovrätten över Skåne och Blekinge, 2006."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2006-64",
  "softwareVersion": "5e18400f22317d5d",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2006-64, RH 2006:64, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2006-64 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:0126d9c048e1d0fa, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2006-64/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:3feef616c2dc89d2cb7059360acf78e2a1142604a0f6ab396d65c448cff65fcd",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:3feef616c2dc89d2cb7059360acf78e2a1142604a0f6ab396d65c448cff65fcd",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:11:19.247Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2006-64",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}