{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2006-62",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:21883591850893b0d4eb9097b236c77ec10ddd38439728be8d1146721b7711d3",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2006:62, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2006-62",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2006-62",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2006:62, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Vid prövning enligt 27 kap. 4 a § rättegångsbalken har bevisningen ansetts inte vara så robust att det framstått som uppenbart att ett italienskt försäkringsbolag har bättre rätt till en beslagtagen bil än den hos vilken beslaget gjorts.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Hovrätten över Skåne och Blekinge, 2006."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2006-62",
  "softwareVersion": "b0d2d89feeab2482",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2006-62, RH 2006:62, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2006-62 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:545fdcbc07a9868e, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2006-62/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:21883591850893b0d4eb9097b236c77ec10ddd38439728be8d1146721b7711d3",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:21883591850893b0d4eb9097b236c77ec10ddd38439728be8d1146721b7711d3",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T06:06:53.605Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2006-62",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}